I’ve recently received some feedback on my
PhD work that I have submitted so far. Without getting too far into it, I am
writing a bit (for this current chapter) on the pairing problem. For those who
are unfamiliar, the pairing problem basically says that it does not appear that
there is anything in virtue of which a mental cause can be paired with a
physical effect, and that where we can describe cause/effect pairings, we do so
in a manner wholly descriptive of the physical (e.g., the cause is x distance away from the effect, the
laws of nature are such-and-such, etc.). Thus, there probably (or necessarily!)
is not any realistic way mental causes can be paired with physical effects.
This has traditionally been used to bring
up a problem for dualist conceptions of action (where humans who have a soul
can interact with the physical world, including their bodies). However, it has
recently been applied by Andrei Buckareff to divine causation as well. This is
where my current research comes in. I’d like to provide a potential positive
model for divine causation, but in order to do so, I’ll need to interact with
the divine pairing problem.
The feedback I received for my progression panel
was really helpful. However, I was reminded that, in a PhD, there is a sense in
which no one knows more of what you’ve written than you do. I am not claiming I
am the world’s expert on the pairing problem (far from it); all I am saying is
that I know what I mean to convey, why I am conveying it, etc., and this can be
advantageous. One of the criticisms was that he thought it may result in the
cause and effect being located in the same place, in which case we are still
left with the question of what pairs the cause and effect together.
While I will need to take care to be clear
on this, I think it makes the mistake of thinking that mental events are or can
be located somewhere, if by located
we mean “physically located.” A counterintuitive result of discussing mental
events or substances as causes and physical location is that these events or
substances as causes are not located anywhere! Nonetheless, I intend to work to
undercut the pairing problem and to see if I can provide a positive model of
God’s creative and sustaining interaction with the world.
I assume you've read these, but, in case you haven't, Rasmussen, Bailey, and Van Horn's "No Pairing Problem" is the best article on the subject, followed closely by Plantinga's "Materialism and Christian Belief.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this! I have not read Plantinga's in full yet, but I have also utilized the "No Pairing Problem" article in one of my chapters!
Delete